The MIT Campaign for a Better World raised $6.24B to help the people of MIT tackle humanity’s urgent global challenges. Watch President Reif’s thank you to the MIT community.
In 2019, 20 women diagnosed with ovarian tumors agreed to try out a new MIT-designed skin patch—a small, clear, flexible disc that may one day become the first noninvasive screening tool for ovarian cancer.
Short of a biopsy, there’s currently no screening method or diagnostic test for ovarian cancer, the fifth-leading cause of cancer deaths among women. MIT researchers Darrell Irvine PhD ’00 and Paula Hammond ’84, PhD ’93 are melding their expertise in engineering, immunology, and polymer chemistry to change that.
“Ovarian cancer over the past 30 years has seen very little improvement in survivability. We need multiple means of addressing this disease; there’s not going to be a single bullet,” says Hammond, Institute Professor and head of the Department of Chemical Engineering. The microneedle patch Hammond is developing with Irvine, the Underwood-Prescott Professor in the departments of biological engineering and materials science and engineering, could become a lifesaving tool for the early detection of ovarian cancer.
The work is supported by the Bridge Project, a collaboration drawing on expertise from the Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research at MIT and the Dana-Farber/ Harvard Cancer Center that brings bioengineering, advanced cancer science, and clinical oncology together to solve today’s most challenging problems in cancer research and care.
Finding ovarian cancer
Hammond has a wealth of experience developing biomaterials to enable targeted drug and gene delivery for a variety of challenging disorders. Yet ovarian cancer strikes her as particularly insidious: it’s hard to detect and often diagnosed too late to save the patient. Further, unlike cancers with known genetic origins, ovarian cancer has more opaque causes. “We’ve needed to be much sneakier about how we approach ovarian cancer,” Hammond says.
She learned some daunting truths about ovarian cancer in 2013, when she met oncologist Dr. Kevin Elias at the Dana- Farber Cancer Institute. Elias, intrigued by nanomedicine’s potential for cancer treatment, became a postdoctoral associate in Hammond’s lab at MIT. When he later started his own lab at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston and began evaluating microRNAs’ (miRNAs) potential as a biomarker, he immediately thought that Hammond and Irvine’s microneedle technology could prove useful.
MiRNAs are small, noncoding strands of RNA that regulate gene expression. Made up of nucleic acids that synthesize proteins in all living cells, miRNAs can be found in blood, urine, saliva, and the interstitial fluid between blood vessels and cells.
Elias knew Irvine, whose background is in immunology, and Hammond had been developing microneedle patches as an alternative to traditional vaccine delivery and as a tool for gauging immune responses and pinpointing infections. But Elias had something else in mind.
When Elias asked, “If I can identify a ‘fingerprint’ of microRNAs associated with ovarian cancer, can we use your tool set to detect it,” Irvine says they started thinking about microneedles as a way to sample material out of—rather than delivering things into—the skin.
Sasan Jalili, a postdoctoral research associate the Koch Institute, helped design the microneedle patches to project only several hundred microns into the skin, where there are few capillaries and pain receptors. The patches are made of a biodegradable, FDA-approved polymer similar to the material used in resorbable sutures. Their tiny prongs are coated with hydrogels, a network of polymers that can absorb water or biological fluids without losing their structure.
Anasuya Mandal SM ’14, PhD ’17, who completed her PhD under Irvine and Hammond, started making hydrogels out of alginate, a benign seaweed extract. Within the alginate matrix, the team was able to incorporate molecular strands that attract the miRNAs Elias hoped to sample.
The alginate layer swells in the presence of water, absorbing interstitial fluid that may contain miRNAs from cancer cells. “They get captured in the hydrogel, and we essentially isolate miRNA from the patch by dissolving the alginate layer,” Hammond says. These recovered molecules are then analyzed for Elias’s ovarian cancer “fingerprint.”
A mail-in cancer test
The women who agreed to participate in the microneedle patch trial had all experienced pelvic discomfort and had already undergone an ultrasound that revealed an ovarian mass.
Doctors suspected—but couldn’t confirm—that these masses were malignant. Only a biopsy can do that, but in the case of ovarian cancer, biopsies are ill-advised.
“We don’t biopsy the ovaries because it risks seeding the abdominal cavity with cancer cells and worsening the prognosis,” Elias says. “So, the decision is really whether you wait and observe it or remove the whole ovary.”
An accurate ovarian cancer test would make this decision crystal clear. The holy grail, according to Elias, would be a noninvasive, accurate cancer screen that a patient could conduct herself.
“The most practical application for the microneedle patch is a patient who lives in a remote part of Maine, six hours away from specialists,” he said. For such a patient, even coming in for a blood sample might be difficult.
Microneedle patches may one day resemble flexible polymer Band-Aids “that can be mailed to somebody’s house and mailed back,” he says.
The women who generously volunteered for the clinical trial had prototype patches affixed to their abdomens with surgical tape. After 30 minutes, the two-by-two squares were removed and checked for miRNAs. “The results are being analyzed in a blinded fashion, so I cannot tell yet whether the miRNA test correctly identified all of the women with cancer,” Elias says. However, in prior analyses, the test identified about 90% of women with ovarian cancer and had a false positive rate of less than 1%.
With continued Bridge Project support, the researchers hope to do a more extensive follow-up to see if the patches will detect ovarian cancer in patients who have not yet been diagnosed with an ovarian mass.
Irvine says the Bridge Project “was absolutely crucial because it allowed us—relatively quickly and without a lot of preliminary data—to pitch this novel approach. And we’re now positioned to raise funds from the National Institutes of Health or other sources that might be interested in supporting our work.”
Elias, now director of Brigham and Women’s Hospital gynecologic oncology laboratory, credits the Bridge Project with enabling higher-risk projects because “the clinicians and the engineers involved can come up with a creative solution to a new problem, rather than focusing on needing to have a large body of preliminary data in order to start sponsoring a project.”
“What’s unique about the Bridge Project,” he say s, “is that it leverages the expertise of the participating institutions.”
Meanwhile, MIT researchers are pushing ahead with microneedle technology. Irvine and Jalili are collaborating with the UMass Chan Medical School on using microneedle patches to monitor immune responses to autoimmune diseases such as psoriasis and lupus. Jalili is using the patches to unravel key immune mechanisms regulating the efficacy of potential vaccines against cancer.
Irvine says, “This is an area that’s going to continue to grow. We’re excited about the potential for using microneedle patches in many different ways, even though it’s really a relatively simple device.”
In late 2020, three researchers working in an area of math called combinatorics wrote a paper proving “a Stembridge-type equality for skew dual stable Grothendieck polynomials.” Relatively few people on the planet know what that means—and co-author Jakin Ng ’25 admits she wasn’t one of them when she dove into the project. “The first time I looked at it, I was like, ‘I don’t know how I’m ever going to be able to understand this,’” she recalls.
At that time, Ng and her research partners, Fiona Abney-McPeek and Serena An, were high school students participating in the MIT Mathematics Department’s yearlong Program for Research in Mathematics, Engineering, and Science (PRIMES). Now they’ve submitted their paper for publication, and Ng is a first-year student at MIT in Course 18-C Mathematics with Computer Science. An is slated to enroll next year, and Abney-McPeek is at Harvard.
PRIMES, Ng says, gave her “a taste of what professional mathematicians do—instead of just learning about results other people have already achieved, actually creating new knowledge.”
PRIMES pairs high schoolers with MIT graduate students and postdocs to investigate unsolved problems. Founded in 2010 by math professor Pavel Etingof and lecturer Slava Gerovitch PhD ’99, it has expanded into several subprograms, all free to students. PRIMES-USA attracts some of the most advanced students nationwide, while PRIMES Circle and MathROOTS are designed to reach talented kids with less previous exposure to higher math. All of the program’s offerings aim to open the world of mathematics to more people, particularly those underrepresented in the field.
Group projects are relatively new for PRIMES-USA, but Ng was glad to be part of a trio so each student could build on the others’ insights. She, Abney-McPeek, and An connected often and had weekly video checkins with their mentor, MIT PhD candidate Adela (YiYu) Zhang ’18.
Zhang provided the high schoolers with background reading on Grothendieck polynomials—the symmetries of which can reveal information about a mathematically important class of geometric objects called Grassmannians—and a roadmap to help them get started. In Ng’s words, “Adela was able to zoom out and give us the macroscopic view of what we should be working on.”
Zhang says her top priority was to help her mentees build the skills and habits all research mathematicians need, such as “being comfortable with getting stuck but still not giving up.”
These are lessons Zhang says she feels she is still learning herself. As a young student in Shanghai, China, she was attracted to math by the beauty of famous theorems, but in her day-to-day research she has had to come to grips with slow progress. She knows what it’s like to feel a bit overwhelmed. “When I started mentoring Jakin’s group, I was just starting to work on my own project for the first time in grad school. So, I can fully sympathize with what it feels like,” she says.
There are successes as well as setbacks. Zhang recalls that Ng spent weeks slogging through examples of an unfamiliar technique called constructing bijections before finally getting the hang of it. “She proved something using this technique, which I found really impressive,” Zhang says. “I was proud of her.”
Ask Ng if there were moments during the year when she thought her team might never get anywhere, and she laughs. “Basically, the whole time except for the end. I think that’s the point. That’s how research goes. You have a small victory, you celebrate it, and then you’re back to not knowing what’s going on.”
Connecting with a community
Both Ng and Zhang say that connecting with others through math has made their research pursuits more rewarding. As an undergraduate at MIT, says Zhang, “I felt very lonely because there weren’t many women doing higher math.” She persevered thanks to encouragement from a female postdoc who supervised her in the Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program (UROP). Zhang went on to serve in turn as a mentor for UROP as well as for PRIMES. The program recognized her ongoing work in 2021 by awarding her a George Lusztig Mentorship.
Ng started building her own math support network while growing up in Ithaca, New York, attending math camps and leading her high school’s Science Olympiad and math competition teams. She’s met some of her closest friends, including her MIT roommate, through such activities. “A lot of what kept me interested in math was having that community,” she says.
Whatever the future holds for Ng, she says she expects math or its applications will play some part in her profession. Meanwhile, she is enjoying a variety of creative activities at MIT, including origami and music. She says PRIMES helped her see that creativity is vital to research. “You’re venturing into territory that no one has ever really studied before,” she says. “You have to think of new ways to look at something. Otherwise, it’s already been done.”
From collaborative labs to classrooms, arts spaces to residences, makerspaces to historical landmarks, the reinvigoration of campus has created a physical environment as open and energized as the people of MIT. Below are stories of alumni and friends who are helping to usher in a major evolution of MIT’s spaces.
“[We hope] to help MIT turn its campus into a competitive advantage.”
Hamid Moghadam ’77, SM ’78 wants to help MIT put its best face forward. His support for the MIT Welcome Center in Kendall Square and for a new Earth and Environment Building at the Green Building, he says, was inspired by his vision of a more inviting campus.
“I thought it would be wonderful to have a focal point where people could have a really great first impression of MIT,” the cofounder and chairman of the San Francisco-based Prologis says of the Welcome Center, which is named for him and his wife, Tina.
Recently opened as part of MIT’s new Kendall Square gateway, the center has a 200-seat auditorium, art installations, and a fun “Welcome Wall” featuring a photo of the MIT Dome enhanced with illustrations.
It’s a space designed with MIT’s prospective students and their families in mind. “While MIT certainly has no problem attracting some of the best students—and while substance is the most important thing—presentation is also important,” Moghadam says, noting that he and his wife hope “to help MIT turn its campus into a competitive advantage.”
The Earth and Environment Building, currently under construction, offers a similar opportunity, he says, lending a “sense of presence” to the 21-story Green Building, designed by I. M. Pei ’40. The new structure will serve as a central hub where students, researchers, faculty, and others can gather for classes, events, and programming on climate, environment, and sustainability issues.
Inside, work will address climate change, “the existential issue of our time,” Moghadam says. “The future is all about the kids, the students, and MIT attracts some of the best,” he says. “If we are to have a planet in the next 100 years, I think it will be these young minds who are going to do it.”
“I received a great education. And I’m ever so grateful.”
Throughout his life, Lord Swraj Paul ’52 has risen to meet diverse challenges. His company, Caparo Group, has gained global recognition since he founded it in 1968. He is a longtime philanthropist and an advisor, as member of the Privy Council, to Queen Elizabeth II.
Looking back, what is his takeaway from these experiences? Gratitude is key.
“I received a great education. And I’m ever so grateful,” says Paul, who grew up in British-ruled India at a time when attending college in the United States seemed almost unfathomable. “During my time at the Institute, I saw how education was infused with the ethic of public service, and I applaud MIT for its continuing commitment to these ideals.”
In 2020, he made a gift in support of the landmark, Eero Saarinen-designed Kresge Auditorium, MIT’s premier venue for world leaders, renowned musicians, distinguished speakers, and student presentations. The 1,200-seat large theater has been named the Lord Swraj Paul PC ’52 and Angad Paul ’92 Theater—or, more colloquially, the Paul Theater—after Paul and his late son, Angad, who graduated from MIT in 1992. His son Akash Paul SM ’81 also attended MIT.
“MIT means a lot to our family, and I am honored that we are able to support the continuation of its values and way of life through this iconic building,” Paul says.
MIT’s campus underwent a major reinvention during the Campaign for a Better World. Historic buildings were ushered into the modern age. New residence halls opened, and libraries were revamped. A new facility was dedicated to groundbreaking work in nanotechnology. A portal between academia and industry—and a new gateway to MIT—was established in Kendall Square, while homes for music, design, computing, and Earth and environmental sciences took shape.
Click the magnifying glass above to view a full image of the map or download a pdf of the map.
1. Theater Arts Building (Building W97)
MIT Theater Arts has undergone exponential growth in stature, scope, and student engagement. The rejuvenation of a former warehouse on Vassar Street created a new space for MIT’s Theater Arts community to collaborate, experiment, and perform. The design of the new W97 respects the utilitarian ethos of the original structure while bringing together various dimensions of MIT’s Theater Arts program under one roof and infusing the building with a new creative energy.
“Blank slate” space that can be shaped and reshaped to accommodate changing uses and performance styles expands the capacity for student creativity. This flexibility has enabled the Theater Arts program to continue to push the boundaries of imagination through avant-garde productions that often incorporate innovative sets and technology.
2. New House Residence (Building W70)
Since 1975, MIT students living in New House have built friendships, completed their PSets, and worked toward creating their futures within the communities of this cluster-style dormitory. These communities—Chocolate City, iHouse, French House, Spanish House, German House, Desmond, and Houses 2, 3, and 4—all have distinct and rich traditions that allow residents to live and socialize with others who share a common bond.
New House’s extensive revitalization, which includes a new layout and features such as a game room, makerspace, and landscaped courtyards, creates the conditions to spark collaborative innovation and lifelong friendships, ensuring that the dormitory’s strong legacy will continue for future generations of MIT students.
3. David H. Koch Childcare Center (Building W64)
Construction of the 14,000-square-foot David H. Koch Childcare Center, which includes a variety of playgrounds, sand pits, climbing features, and gardens, nearly doubled the number of childcare slots available on campus for infants, toddlers, and preschoolers. The center meets a critical need for MIT community members who pursue demanding careers while raising families. It also helps the Institute to attract and retain new talent.
The center was created through the generous support of David H. Koch ’62, SM ’63, Charles W. Johnson ’55, and Jennifer C. Johnson.
5. Richard J. Resch Boathouse (Building W8)
MIT’s Richard J. Resch Boathouse has undergone a substantial renovation to enhance the experience of student-athletes in its Division 1 crew program, and of club rowers and community groups.
A naming gift from MIT crew alumnus Richard Resch ’61, along with other gifts made by fellow crew alumni, supported the renovation of the former Harold W. Pierce Boathouse, originally dedicated in 1966.
The multiyear project modernized the 22,000-gross-square-foot facility and has improved the practice and competition experience for all four MIT Crew varsity teams as well as students using the rowing machines for recreation. The renovation brought new windows and general upgrades, a dock with improved accessibility, a deck extension to add a second means of egress, larger men’s and women’s locker rooms, expanded boat storage, new offices, increased training spaces, and a meeting area.
6. New Vassar Residence (Building W46)
The New Vassar residence, the first undergraduate living community built at MIT since Simmons Hall in 2002, features dynamic spaces that are equal to its residents’ big ideas. The design focuses on the “critical pathways” students take to navigate the halls, aiming to increase opportunities for serendipitous meetings, collaborations, and cross-disciplinary interactions.
Features like indoor and outdoor makerspaces, music practice rooms, and fitness rooms facilitate learning outside the classroom and student well-being, while the dining hall includes an open kitchen that provides students with the opportunity to cook for themselves. These features were inspired by input from students, faculty, and staff, and reflect a fluidity between the academic and living experiences that are formative elements of a student’s journey at MIT.
8. Kresge Auditorium (Building W16)
Kresge Auditorium was designed in tandem with the MIT Chapel by Finnish-American architect Eero Saarinen and built at the center of campus, where since 1955, its 1,200-seat auditorium has hosted student performances, symposia, and many community activities. The mid-century Modernist building, named for Sebastian S. Kresge and the Kresge Foundation, was restored and revitalized in recent years, a major capital project that included structural upgrades as well as improvements to energy efficiency and accessibility.
As part of the renovation, Kresge’s large theater was named the Lord Swraj Paul PC ’52 and Angad Paul ’92 Theater—or, more colloquially, the Swraj Paul Theater—in honor of a gift from MIT alumnus Lord Swraj Paul and in memory of Angad.
The restoration team included architects, engineers, and fabricators who carefully preserved Kresge’s key architectural elements while equipping the structure for the demands of modern campus life.
11. MIT Chapel (Building W15)
Designed in tandem with the Kresge Auditorium building by Finnish-American architect Eero Saarinen, the MIT Chapel represented a modernist departure from the classical style of older campus buildings when it was dedicated in 1955.
For decades the Chapel has served as a nondenominational gathering place for worship, meditation, and private ceremonies. The round, windowless structure features a domed central skylight that illuminates a cascading metal sculpture of rods and crosspieces. A renewal project in recent years restored the beauty of the building’s moat, which allows a soft light to fill the Chapel through openings at the base of the walls.
12. Samuel Tak Lee Building (Building 9)
The renovation of Building 9 brought together everything to do with urban development and real estate under one roof.
A gift from alumnus and global real estate developer Samuel Tak Lee ’62, SM ’64 in 2015 presented MIT with an opportunity to refurbish the 1967 building’s outdated infrastructure and configuration. In addition to major overhauls to the HVAC system, windows, and accessibility, improvements included replacing dark classrooms with learning spaces filled with natural light, and adding common spaces. A multimedia-enhanced open space called the City Arena facilitates interaction with participants in cities across the globe.
Lee’s gift also established within the building a lab bearing his name dedicated to socially responsible real estate entrepreneurship, with a particular focus on China.
13. Wright Brothers Wind Tunnel (Building 17)
Few structures better embody the intermingling of aviation history and innovation than the Wright Brothers Wind Tunnel. Since 1938, the facility has been at the heart of MIT’s Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AeroAstro), providing thousands of students with unparalleled opportunities to learn aeronautical engineering concepts and apply them to coursework and research.
In 2019, the vintage wind tunnel was demolished to make way for a new facility, funded in part by a gift from The Boeing Company and from Becky Samberg and the late Arthur (Art) Samberg ’62.
With a test area volume of 1,600 cubic feet and the ability to test speeds up to 200 mph, the new tunnel is the largest and most advanced academic wind tunnel in the nation, and more than doubles the volume of the test section where models are put through their paces. Building 17, the tunnel’s home, also has been overhauled, introducing new space for faculty and the MIT Rocket Team.
14. Building 31
Building 31—officially known as the Sloan Laboratories—home to the departments of aeronautics and astronautics and mechanical engineering, has been transformed into a gleaming collaborative space for research in autonomous vehicles, turbomachinery, energy storage, and transportation. With nearly 7,000 square feet of new space, the building doubled its capacity for faculty, students, and researchers.
At the heart of the building is the Kresa Center for Autonomous Systems, a 80-foot-long by 40-foot-wide space boasting 25-foot ceilings, dedicated for work in all types of autonomous vehicles including rotor and fixed-wing aircraft and enabled by a gift from Kent Kresa ’59, SM ’61, EAA ’66, ENG ’66. The building also features test spaces for unpiloted aerial vehicles, a roof deck for flying robotics, and upgraded supersonic and subsonic tunnels.
15. Great Dome (Building 10)
The Great Dome overlooking Killian Court is perhaps the most famous image on MIT’s campus, appearing in countless photographs and on letterhead, class rings, and souvenirs. Constructed in 1916, it has been the site of many student “hacks,” such as an MIT police cruiser, R2-D2 from Star Wars, and Captain America’s shield.
Although its skylight was blacked out during World War II to prevent detection by enemy bombers, today the sun once again shines through the oculus in MIT’s Great Dome, flooding the reading room of the Barker Engineering Library with natural light. A team of restoration specialists worked to protect the Dome’s structural integrity while retaining the historical design created by MIT alumnus William Welles Bosworth (Class of 1889).
16. Lisa T. Su Building—MIT.nano (Building 12)
Steps from the Infinite Corridor, the Lisa T. Su Building, home to MIT.nano, is designed to support the activities of more than 2,000 faculty and researchers as they design and manipulate materials, organisms, and devices at the nanoscale: one billionth of a meter. The building is named in honor of Lisa T. Su ’90, SM ’91, PhD ’94, chief executive officer and chair of the Board of Directors of AMD. Su is the first MIT alumna to make a gift for a building that will bear her own name.
The building is the largest, most sophisticated, and most accessible university research facility of its kind in the United States.
Constructed with soaring glass facades and powerful air-exchange systems, the facility houses two levels of connected clean rooms, an instrumentation floor, chemistry labs, prototyping labs, and the virtual-reality and visualization Immersion Lab.
18. The Simons Building (Building 2)
MIT’s historic Building 2 is part of the iconic Main Group that comprised the MIT campus when it first moved to Cambridge from Boston in 1916. The Main Group was designed by architect William Welles Bosworth in 1889 and had remained largely unchanged for a century.
In 2016, the building was named The Simons Building in honor of James H. ’58 and Marilyn Simons, whose generosity enabled its restoration and renovation. The building is home to the Institute’s renowned Department of Mathematics.
The renovation project featured a detailed restoration of the original limestone façade; reconfiguration and modernization of classrooms, offices, and collaborative spaces; and the addition of a fourth floor.
19. Hayden Library and Courtyard (Building 14)
For generations of MIT students and alumni, Hayden Library has been more than just a quiet study space. It’s a place where visitors search for one thing, look down the row of books, and often find something else: inspiration.
The renovated library and adjoining Building 14 Courtyard are designed to invite such serendipitous connections. The first floor of the library is open 24 hours, with group-study rooms plus an event space. A library cafe offers coffee and snacks. Signature bay windows overlooking the Charles River are fitted with energy-conserving insulated glass. The courtyard’s serpentine walkway is lined with katsura trees. A porch blends inside and outside, with accordion windows opening fully to the courtyard. The striking renovations were made possible with the support of MIT’s alumni and friends.
21. Ralph Landau Building (Building 66)
One of four buildings on campus designed by the late I.M. Pei ’40, Building 66, built in 1976, is the main research building for the Department of Chemical Engineering (ChemE), which was instrumental in the development of the modern petrochemical industry and has played a pioneering role in biomedical engineering.
ChemE sets the standard for research and education in the field, and its students are a force in MIT’s culture of creativity. Building 66 is where they dig in. The renewal and modernization of the building saw upgrades to the undergraduate teaching laboratory, to spaces for professional mentoring, and to office and meeting space for graduate and undergraduate students, aimed at promoting the teaching and collaboration at the heart of a strong learning community.
22. MIT Museum (Building E28)
The new MIT Museum that opens in fall 2022 will welcome visitors to the world of science and technology while offering a window on cutting-edge research underway at the Institute. Located in Kendall Square, gateway to MIT, the museum’s 67,000 square feet will encompass galleries, classrooms, a dynamic public makerspace, and a soaring two-story atrium for meeting and discussing ideas.
A new gallery, MIT Collects, will highlight many pieces never before exhibited, in installations such as Modeling Everything and Totally Useless Things, spotlighting toys, puzzles, play, and the role of creativity in scientific research. Another exhibition, Essential MIT, will highlight the process of inquiry and discovery as demonstrated in ongoing research projects. The museum has been made possible by the generosity of MIT’s donors.
23. Moghadam Welcome Center, MIT Admissions, MIT InnovationHQ (Building E38)
The newest gateway to MIT is just steps from the Kendall/MIT MBTA subway station. Home to MIT Admissions, the Moghadam Welcome Center, a gift of Hamid ’77, SM ’78 and Tina Moghadam, and the new MIT InnovationHQ (iHQ), E38 provides a bright, open, welcoming entrance into the Institute for thousands of prospective students, visitors, and Cambridge community members every year. Visitors can stop by the center for wayfinding and other information about campus and the local area, and can attend in-person information sessions in the center’s 200-seat auditorium.
E38 also adds more than 50,000 square feet to MIT’s Innovation ecosystem. Five floors house iHQ, which serves as a hub for students at every stage of their entrepreneurial journeys and includes space for alumni, faculty members, and staff. Each floor features open, flexible layouts, and six departments, labs, and centers that formerly supported student entrepreneurship from different parts of campus now call it home.
24. Kendall Open Space
Kendall Square’s new open space is where MIT and the Cambridge community can come together to socialize, unwind, connect, and discover. Programmed by MIT but open to all, this colorful cluster of activity enhances the streetscape and brings a new energy to the Kendall innovation district.
The sweeping space, spread over two acres, is now the backdrop to a lively, welcoming swarm of activity in what was once a commuter-centric cityscape. Visitors might come upon an interactive art installation, a participative science experiment, or an invention being tested by students. The hum in the air evokes the innovative spirit of MIT and Kendall Square.
25. Graduate Residence and Childcare (Building E37)
Built in the heart of Kendall Square taking the lived experience of MIT students into account, the 28-story graduate residence is a new kind of experience for graduate students and their families.
Its 454 housing units provide one- and two-bedroom apartments prioritized for families with children, as well as efficiencies for single graduate students. To serve its population mix of families and singles, the building houses a childcare facility that is open to the wider MIT community and includes an array of common areas, ranging from quiet study spaces, a family lounge, indoor playroom, outdoor playground, and access to abundant green space.
26. Morris and Sophie Chang Building (Building E52)
An Art Deco landmark built in 1938 on the Charles River, the Morris and Sophie Chang Building is headquarters for the Department of Economics and home to the MIT Sloan School of Management’s student and administrative services. It also houses the busy Samberg Conference Center, a treasured resource for the entire MIT community.
The building was restored and renovated through a generous gift from Morris Chang ’52, SM ’53, ME ’55 and his wife, Sophie Chang. The conference center is named for the late Arthur (Art) Samberg ’62 and his wife, Rebecca Samberg, longtime supporters of the Institute.
4. Burton Conner Residence (Building W51)
A renewal project is underway to update Burton Conner House, a beloved residence hall constructed in the 1920s and last renovated in the early 1970s. Working with the architectural and preservation firm Goody Clancy, the Institute is equipping Burton Conner for the needs of students today and tomorrow, taking care to retain the building’s best features. Goody Clancy’s project manager is a former resident of Conner 3.
The project includes new windows, renovated plumbing and heating systems, refreshed kitchens, renovated suite bathrooms, and accessibility upgrades. New corridors will connect the Burton and Conner sides of the residence on floors 2–5 and the residence will have a new makerspace and an accessible elevator.
The updated Burton Conner will continue to be a warm and inviting place where students learn together, enjoy socializing, and develop lifelong friendships.
7. Music Building (Building W18)
MIT’s conservatory-level music program enrolls more than 1,500 students each year, and the campus is home to a variety of ensembles and chamber groups.
Currently under construction, a new Music Building adjacent to Kresge Auditorium will be designed to meet the current and future needs of the music program. With space for performance, practice, and instruction, the building will further the Institute’s commitment to music education, consolidate many of the music program’s activities into one location, and incorporate critical aspects of acoustical design.
The building’s centerpiece, a purpose-built performance lab will provide a uniquely flexible, large-scale space for experimenting with various formats. A cornerstone gift from Joyce Linde, a longtime supporter of MIT and the arts, made the building’s construction possible.
17. MIT Stephen A. Schwarzman College of Computing (Building 45)
A centralized headquarters for the MIT Stephen A. Schwarzman College of Computing is critical to the college’s mission of engaging faculty, students, and collaborators across a broad array of disciplines in computing and artificial intelligence education, research, and innovation.
Located in the center of the Vassar Street block at the heart of campus, the building—designed by Skidmore, Owings & Merrill—will sit at a busy intersection of MIT’s intellectual traffic that brings together the college, disciplines across the Institute, and the Kendall Square innovation community.
The building will be a hub for disciplinary and interdisciplinary work in computing, with spaces that encourage collaboration. It will also support activities such as the MIT Quest for Intelligence, and will include space for visiting scholars, administration, and events, plus an outdoor terrace with sweeping views.
20. Earth and Environment Building (Building 55), Green Building (Building 54)
Rising nearly 300 feet from the ground, the Cecil and Ida Green Building has towered over MIT’s campus for more than 50 years. Yet it’s not obvious from the outside what actually goes on within this imposing structure designed by the late I.M. Pei ’40.
This is the headquarters of MIT’s Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences (EAPS), and home to such groundbreaking work as seismic tomography, numerical weather prediction, climate modeling, the development of chaos theory, and far-reaching NASA missions.
Now, a new building adjacent to the Green Building—made possible thanks to a cornerstone gift from Hamid ’77, SM ’78 and Tina Moghadam plus support from numerous other EAPS donors—will add a major new collaborative hub for environmental and climate research to campus. The building brings together EAPS, MIT’s Environmental Solutions Initiative, and the MIT-WHOI Joint Program in Oceanography/Applied Ocean Science and Engineering.
Meanwhile, infrastructure improvements will modernize the iconic Green Building, keeping MIT at the vanguard of Earth systems and climate science research.
9. Metropolitan Storage Warehouse Building (Building W41)
The Metropolitan Storage Warehouse on the corner of Massachusetts Avenue and Vassar Street has long been a familiar presence to the MIT and Cambridge communities. Now, an innovative renovation project is converting this iconic building into a modern hub for interdisciplinary design research and education; a new home for the MIT School of Architecture and Planning; and a location for the recently established MIT Morningside Academy for Design as well as the largest community-wide makerspace on campus, managed by Project Manus.
As our faculty and students demonstrate time and again, design is the bridge between invention and innovation, sparking bold approaches and solutions to some of the world’s most pressing challenges, from climate change to transportation to public health. The renovation will usher in a new era for design, architecture, urban planning, entrepreneurship, and making at MIT while adapting a remarkable historic structure for contemporary use.
10. Stratton Student Center (Building W20)
The Stratton Student Center is the hub for student life at MIT, the prime spot on campus where students can grab a bite to eat between classes, collaborate on a group project, attend a club meeting, mail a package, and get a haircut—all in the same place.
The renewal of the center will improve design coherence, update infrastructure, and enhance flexible-use space to accommodate a range of uses and provide a more welcoming environment. A highly visible, student-friendly Wellbeing Lab, coordinated by the Office of Student Wellbeing, will serve as the anchor and heart of campus-wide wellbeing initiatives.
With a warm and inviting atmosphere, the revitalized Stratton Student Center will help MIT’s students thrive, encouraging them to care for their physical and emotional wellbeing, build relationships with others, and explore their purpose.
Continuous renewal and renovation of MIT’s physical facilities is an essential component of the Institute’s mission to advance knowledge and educate students. During the recent MIT Campaign for a Better World, the MIT community raised more than $600 million in support of capital needs. Julie A. Lucas, the Institute’s Vice President for Resource Development, talks about how this collective generosity is helping to fuel a campus transformation.
To meet the needs of our community, MIT’s campus has changed substantially over the past decade and is continuing to evolve. How does philanthropy help make this possible?
MIT is fortunate to have many alumni and friends who share the Institute’s vision for a modern, sustainable campus that can equip students, faculty, and staff to take on big challenges—now and decades from now. Our donors have contributed to the creation of new forward-thinking interdisciplinary research, innovation, living, learning, and maker facilities. They have also helped us reinvigorate and maintain MIT treasures such as the Great Dome, Kresge Auditorium, and the Hayden Library and Building 14 Courtyard, plus numerous other spaces that underpin our education and research activities.
Can you share some examples of impactful projects?
It’s difficult to pick! The Campaign made it possible to create MIT’s first dedicated music building, which is expected to open in 2024. The arts are vital to MIT; hundreds of our students arrive on campus as trained musicians, while others become music lovers through classes or extracurricular activities. The building will have state-of-the-art production facilities, music technology labs, and performance spaces, a huge benefit for MIT and the local community. Next year, MIT will gain a new home for the Stephen A. Schwarzman College of Computing at the heart of campus, reflecting the important role computing plays across all disciplines at MIT.
Another notable project is the renovation of the iconic Metropolitan Storage Warehouse building. When it opens in 2025, the Met Warehouse will be a new home for our School of Architecture and Planning and the recently established MIT Morningside Academy for Design. It will also have the largest makerspace on campus.
Where have you seen the most dramatic changes?
It has to be in Kendall Square, which has been reimagined as a thriving new gateway to the Institute. The area now has the new Moghadam Welcome Center, Admissions Office, and innovation and entrepreneurship hub. It is also home to the relocated MIT Museum, a graduate residence, and two acres of open space for everyone to enjoy.
The neighborhood’s palpable new energy is a powerful reminder that our campus is so much more than bricks and mortar. Thanks to the generosity of our alumni and friends, MIT has been able to build, restore, and maintain facilities that will empower the world’s best thinkers, teachers, and makers for the next century and beyond.
What motivates an MIT economist?
“I entered the field to figure out how to make some progress on big, fundamental problems in society,” says Parag Pathak, the Class of 1922 Professor of Economics in the School of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences, and a director of Blueprint Labs, a policy-oriented economic research group at MIT. “One of these problems is the inequality of opportunity.”
David H. Autor, the Ford Professor of Economics, specializes in the impacts of technology on work. He wants to understand “how we minimize adverse consequences of a changing economy and shape opportunities to create a world we all want to live in.”
Driven by such concerns, Pathak and Autor, as well as such departmental colleagues as Joshua Angrist, recipient of the 2021 Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences, and 2018 MacArthur Fellow Amy Finkelstein PhD ’01, are engaged in research with the power to reshape key sectors of public life. Their studies of health care, education, and the workforce— grounded in theory, novel experimentation, and data analysis—provide insights that frequently capture the attention of the press and sometimes shake up their field.
“We have been a pioneering department for decades, and successful because we are highly innovative while at the same time quite practical,” says Autor. “New ideas start at MIT and diffuse from there.”
Randomized trials light the way
In 2008, Finkelstein, the John and Jennie S. MacDonald Professor of Economics, encountered what she calls a “once-in-a-lifetime opportunity”: the state of Oregon was running a lottery to allocate a limited number of health care slots to uninsured citizens. She sprang into action to take advantage of this real-world, randomized trial. With research partner Katherine Baicker (now at the University of Chicago), Finkelstein evaluated the effects of Medicaid coverage on the uninsured, following both the lottery winners and losers over several years.
“What we did was not rocket science; it was economic science,” says Finkelstein. “The incredible response to Oregon showed a real demand and appreciation for evidence.”
Finkelstein realized that vanishingly few interventions tailored to improve the delivery of health care were subject to the kind of strict evaluations typical of medical research, and she decided that needed to change. She launched the US Health Care Delivery Initiative (HCDI), a research program based in MIT’s Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab (J-PAL).
With a dual mission of research and policy action, the initiative identifies significant health care issues, and in partnership with affiliate researchers, health care organizations, and government agencies, conducts randomized controlled trials that generate evidence about the efficacy of a health care intervention.
In the past few years alone, HCDI researchers have investigated a wide range of health-related questions, such as the relative benefits of different treatments for renal disease, the possible effects of provider race on the health behavior of Black men, and the effectiveness of employee wellness programs.
In one case, HCDI research helped develop letters health care agencies could use to persuade physicians to stop overprescribing powerful opiates. Finkelstein worked with a former student who successfully designed and tested an effective version of this intervention, leading to a major reduction in prescription rates. “I see myself as a research activist, increasing appreciation for rigorous evidence, training the next generation to get evidence, and then getting that evidence out in the policy world,” she says.
Scanning future projects, Finkelstein says she is “incredibly excited about people in our network seeing what happens if we forgive people’s medical debt, which can be psychologically and financially crushing.”
Cause and effect in education
At Blueprint Labs, founded as the School Effectiveness and Inequality Initiative in 2012, Pathak and Angrist, the Ford Professor of Economics, wield research from the fields of market design and econometrics to illuminate issues in education that are of broad concern to the public and decision makers alike.
“The most important, systematic determinant of family income is the human capital of earners, the schooling of earners,” says Angrist. “If you get a college education, the odds of being in poverty go way down.” The corollary is that the quality of schools matters, Angrist adds, and if schools don’t impart essential skills to graduates “then schooling doesn’t have an inequality-ameliorating effect.” Angrist’s pathbreaking empirical strategies measure the effects of policies intended to influence the quality and accessibility of schools, research that can be used to improve policy.
With evidence from such research in hand, Pathak has in the past decade provided public school systems in Boston, New York, Chicago, and elsewhere with a more efficient and equitable method for allocating seat assignments in highly desirable schools. With an algorithm similar to that used by Uber to link riders with drivers, Pathak’s approach impartially matches students to their choice schools.
“Something that makes us distinct is that we love to interact with practitioners,” says Pathak of MIT economists. “Much of our research is animated by someone with real concrete problems, who calls us up and says, ‘What should we do?’”
Complementing this work, Angrist is refining the measurement of school quality. One of his studies challenges long-held claims of exceptional academic effectiveness by exclusive exam schools like the storied Boston Latin School and New York’s Bronx Science. Angrist, Pathak, and their collaborators demonstrate that attendance at these selective schools has “no actual causal effect on learning,” he says.
Breaking down what he calls this “elite illusion” serves as a great teaching moment in Angrist’s undergraduate econometrics class, he says. Students are surprised to learn that many of them likely did well academically not because of their school but because they were smart anyway, Angrist says.
Angrist, Pathak, and their Blueprint Labs partners have shown that public preschools boost college attendance, and they have revealed that urban charter schools can elevate student achievement. Now they are producing findings relevant to the ongoing debate about making education at all levels more affordable and accessible.
Blueprint Lab’s primary goal, says Pathak, is “understanding the role of schools in the production of opportunity.”
Taking agency in the workplace
In spring 2018, MIT President L. Rafael Reif handed Autor his marching orders: Organize a task force to address the ways that technology is changing the nature of work. Two-and-a-half years later, the interdisciplinary Work of the Future group wrapped up its challenging assignment with dozens of expert papers and a major report, Building Better Jobs in an Era of Intelligent Machines.
But the task force didn’t just focus on the impacts of artificial intelligence, autonomous vehicles, manufacturing, and supply chains, Autor says. “We also wanted to understand the levers that shape how we adapt to technology and how we shape technology itself.”
The idea of agency plays a major role in Autor’s research. “Technological changes and economic phenomena are driven by incentives and priorities and people’s vision of what the future is supposed to be,” he says.“This is something that MIT, and government, and we collectively as society, shape.”
Consonant with this view, Autor launched a Work of the Future initiative based at J-PAL, which focuses on exploring ways to help people who lack significant formal education to find high-quality jobs. “This is the biggest problem of the US labor market right now, with 35% of adults stuck in low-paid jobs,” he says. Technology has had a huge effect in hollowing out middle-tier jobs, and “the question is how to get people onto career ladders that lead elsewhere.”
In the drive for answers, Autor and a far-flung network of research partners are evaluating evidence from programs that explicitly address this problem. Among these is a program in New York that trains non-college-educated adults for 15 months, then places them in technology jobs where they earn on average four times their previous income.
Autor also devises his own real-world experiments. One project aims to determine whether establishing a minimum, livable wage for restaurant workers can also reduce employee turnover at their companies. Another involves studying whether relaxing criteria on criminal background checks can offer a path out of hardship to workers while sustaining employer satisfaction.
“Many employers won’t touch people with nonviolent misdemeanors, a category in the criminal justice system where minorities are hugely overrepresented,” Autor says. “This is a matter of equity in opportunity.”
He is eyeing another experiment with potentially enormous payoffs for employment equity: eliminating the college requirement for jobs in such areas as tech support, programming, and computer security. “A vast majority of people who are Black and Hispanic don’t have four-year degrees, and yet that has become the sine qua non for all kinds of positions—not always the correct decision,” he says. Autor is joining with partners from the corporate world to advance this research.
For Autor, this research is not just about “describing how the world is working but improving how things work.” He might well be speaking on behalf of his fellow economists. “Applying a scientific lens to the world’s most pressing problems— that’s where our energy is dedicated.”
When the new MIT Museum opens in fall 2022, it will provide public access to the world of science and technology and a window into the cutting-edge research underway at the Institute. Relocated to a central spot in bustling Kendall Square, the new museum will feature 57,000 square feet of galleries, classrooms, a dynamic public makerspace, and a soaring two-story seating area where people can meet and discuss ideas.
The MIT Museum’s collection encompasses more than a million objects, prints, rare books, drawings, photographs, films, and holograms that reflect the wide interests of the MIT community from the Institute’s founding in 1861 to today. A new gallery, MIT Collects, will highlight many pieces that have never been exhibited before within installations ranging from Modeling Everything to Totally Useless Things, a collection focused on toys, puzzles, play, and the role of creativity in scientific research.
The museum, made possible partly through the generosity of MIT’s donors, will also feature an exhibition called Essential MIT. Centered on the process of inquiry and discovery, this exhibition will spotlight ongoing research projects.
John Durant, the Mark R. Epstein (Class of 1963) Director of the MIT Museum, says museum staff are excited to welcome back visitors. “We are really keen to be a meeting ground between the academic community and the wider community, especially around issues that need a full discussion in public,” he says. “So please come join the conversation. That’s what we’re about.”
Paving the way to a healthier global future calls for audacious, creative, interdisciplinary problem solving in the hands of exceptional talent. All these ingredients are at work at MIT.
Below are stories of MIT alumni and friends who are helping MIT bring its multidimensional strengths in the life and social sciences and other disciplines to bear on critical human health challenges.
“You have a high concentration of brilliant minds that hunger for really hard problems.”
Emily and Malcolm Fairbairn ’84, SM ’85, of Orinda, California, are on a mission to cure Lyme disease. They want to give hope to people who—like themselves and their family members—have been afflicted.
“I know how people feel and what they’re going through,” says Emily. “It will take committed, private donors to fund critical research necessary to prevent and treat a disease that affects millions of Americans.”
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, roughly 476,000 people get Lyme disease each year in the United States. Transmitted through the bite of infected ticks, Lyme causes fever, headache, fatigue, joint and body pain, brain fog, and a characteristic skin rash. If left untreated, infection can spread to joints, the heart, and the nervous system.
The couple’s support of Lyme research at MIT spans a broad range of efforts, including research led by Linda Griffith, the School of Engineering Professor of Teaching Innovation in the Department of Biological Engineering, and collaborations through the MIT Sandbox Innovation Fund Program to investigate chronic health problems associated with Lyme and Covid-19.
“You have a high concentration of brilliant minds that hunger for really hard problems,” Fairbairn says. “We want to help unleash that energy and creativity!”
Fairbairn hopes seeding research projects and facilitating novel partnerships will attract more funding. “Curing this disease will take billions of dollars and a lot of concerted effort by brilliant scientists like Linda.”
“Mental health is important for MIT and personal to us.”
Henry Lichstein ’65, ’66, SM ’66 and his wife, Janine, had a straightforward goal for their MIT philanthropy: expanding mental health services available to students. Having lost their son, Daniel, to suicide during his junior year in college, the couple has supported mental health and suicide prevention programs ever since. Janine has been an active volunteer and board member for a suicide prevention group in their home state of California, while Henry shifted his approach to giving at MIT, seeking effective ways to support MIT students.
After learning about the Institute’s MindHandHeart initiative and meeting with leaders of MIT Medical’s Student Mental Health and Counseling Services, Henry and Janine created the Lichstein Family Mental Health and Counseling Fund to support a postdoctoral fellowship in clinical psychology and funded it for four years. The inaugural fellow began in the fall 2020 semester, assisting full-time clinicians in caring for MIT students.
“Mental health is important for MIT and personal to us,” says Henry. “I would like to think that what we’ve done will mean better mental health outcomes for people on the MIT campus.” Now working with early-stage companies after a 30-year career at Citibank, Henry reflects, “Given that my success was tied to the friends I made and the skills I learned at MIT, it’s only right that we support MIT. We were glad to find a creative program in an area important to us. We are delighted by the outcome.”
“Each one of us has an obligation to ensure a better and safer future.”
The head of one of Brazil’s largest retailers hopes his support for postdoctoral fellowships at MIT will help create a digital platform for health that benefits people worldwide.
Fred Trajano is CEO of his family’s Magazine Luiza retail chain; the company’s app, Magalu, has been revolutionizing e-commerce in Brazil. Now, after seeing the devastating impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic, Trajano hopes to support a similar transformation in health care.
“The pandemic awakened in me a particular interest in the transformative role of science and research in society,” Trajano says. “I feel each one of us has an obligation to ensure a better and safer future.”
His gift to MIT has established the Fred Trajano Postdoctoral Fellowship in the Laboratory for Computational Physiology at MIT’s Institute for Medical Engineering and Science. The lab works to improve health care by developing new and refined approaches to interpreting data.
“Big data, artificial intelligence, and predictive analysis are now the lingua franca through which health care professionals communicate as they diagnose, treat, and deliver care. The digital transformation is empowering them to deliver quality care more effectively, more safely, and more efficiently,” he says.
The global marshaling of resources to create vaccines for Covid-19 shows how much can be achieved in science when backed with enough resources, Trajano adds. “This is a trend that will benefit patients everywhere.”
Watch: Supporting Human Health at MIT
If it takes a village to raise a child, it takes an ecosystem to grow excellence in research. Scientists work long hours, pursuing insights, hitting dead ends, and revising their roadmaps so they can move toward discovery. And science is powered by discoveries made by those whose trajectories were anything but clear at the outset—researchers willing and eager to follow a hunch or a passion without knowing where it might lead.
Today, significant support for this “discovery” research comes from private foundations. At MIT, researchers eager to explore fresh territory have received timely support in the form of gifts and grants from foundations that are increasingly investing in research potential. This kind of funding fills a crucial niche, placing necessary bets on a novel idea, a mid-career pivot, or a promising but unproven young researcher. As the below examples illustrate, the payoff is that science moves forward.
Fuel for a breakthrough
Pablo Jarillo-Herrero likes to encourage his students to take risks. “I ask them to imagine themselves as a scientific Indiana Jones,” says Jarillo-Herrero, the Cecil and Ida Green Professor of Physics, referring to the hero of the Raiders of the Lost Ark movie franchise. “To think like explorers going into the jungle with a machete, with only a vague idea of where they might end up.”
Jarillo-Herrero’s own trek has led him to a discovery many think could usher in a new generation of superconductors with potential applications from energy transport to levitating trains to quantum computing. The discovery involves two sheets of graphene—a two-dimensional material consisting of a layer of graphite just one-atom thick—stacked at the so-called “magic angle.” That magic angle somehow creates a crystalline lattice that allows electrons to flow freely between the two stacked sheets.
“Electrons are negatively charged and normally repel each other,” says Jarillo- Herrero. “We don’t usually see this in solids because they have considerable kinetic energy. But in sheets of graphene, set at a certain angle, the kinetic energy drops, and another force, their repulsive interaction energy, becomes more prominent. Then crazy things can happen. We found a system that could be either a superconductor or a different type of insulator, depending on how many electrons we put into that system.”
Along with his Indiana Jones spirit, the rising physics star credits critical support from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation for fueling his work; the foundation named him an investigator for its Emergent Phenomena in Quantum Systems Initiative in 2014. “I was looking at a funding cliff,” he says, noting that his group had a number of grants that were expiring in 2016 and 2017. “But these were also extraordinary years for our group, with so many things just coming into focus. I didn’t have the mental bandwidth to write grants at the same time. With the Moore funding, we were able to dedicate all our energies to our research and push the project through to completion.”
Jarillo-Herrero is quick to note that other funders, including the National Science Foundation, were also instrumental in his magic angle research. “The Moore funding was less restrictive,” he adds. “With it, we could change directions midway, reallocate resources to projects that had suddenly become interesting. The Moore Foundation encouraged and enabled us to take those necessary risks.”
For a brief time after birth, a baby’s heart cells can repair and regenerate themselves following cardiac injury. As we continue to grow into adults, our hearts lose this capacity. Laurie Boyer wants to know how that happens and if there is a way to harness this process to fix hearts.
“The body has cells, like skin and blood cells, that constantly renew themselves,” says Boyer, a professor of biology and biological engineering at MIT. “But the developed heart lacks dedicated stem cells like these other tissues. Instead, cardiac muscle cells stop dividing early after birth, making it difficult to replace damaged cells in response to injury or disease. We hoped that if we could learn how to turn back the developmental clock, we could restore the heart’s capacity to replace lost cells.”
Boyer spent much of her career studying stem cells and the gene regulatory mechanisms that drive their development. After college, she worked at Integrated Genetics/Genzyme during the day and spent her nights volunteering in the lab of David Housman, the Virginia and D. K. Ludwig Scholar for Cancer Research at MIT. Housman helped steer Boyer to a PhD program at the University of Massachusetts Medical School. She joined the MIT biology faculty in 2007 and received tenure in 2014. She also joined the Department of Biological Engineering.
In 2017, Boyer submitted a proposal to the G. Harold and Leila Y. Mathers Foundation. She’d already compiled an impressive academic record, helping to decipher the role of the epigenome in the cellular decisionmaking process. She had funding from leading institutions including the National Institutes of Health, but she also hoped to take on new challenges. “I was thinking about the future of our research,” she explains. “I wanted to pivot toward projects with translational potential, projects whose success requires new ideas and new developments in technology, but institutional funding doesn’t typically afford you the time to do that.”
She received a three-year grant that provided her the opportunity to make this pivot. “Foundation funding fueled an exciting new phase of discovery,” Boyer says.
“We are now charting the various signals that converge on the heart genome and tell it how to grow and function,” says Boyer, who has found a novel connection between a metabolic enzyme and cardiac maturation. “If we can understand the mechanisms that regulate these cell fate transitions, perhaps we can discover new therapies.”
Early career impact
MIT postdoc Gladys Chepkirui Ngetich can’t remember a time she didn’t love math and physics. An interest in thermofluids and turbomachinery took her to Kenya’s Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, and then to Oxford University in England as a Rhodes Scholar. She wrote her PhD thesis on jet engine coolants.
Ngetich came to the United States and MIT in 2020 as a Schmidt Science Fellow and joined the Space Enabled research group in the MIT Media Lab. The group works to advance justice in Earth’s complex systems by using designs inspired and enabled by space research. Ngetich, who was named an International Astronautical Federation “Emerging Space Leader” in 2021, is deeply committed to sustainable development goals, and she has shifted her research from jet engine coolants to environmentally friendly, wax-based propellants for use in rocket launches and in-space propulsion.
“The Schmidt Science Fellowship has given me a special chance to step out of my comfort zone and try a research area very different from my PhD,” says Ngetich, who hopes one day to contribute to Kenya’s space sector. “This interdisciplinary research has introduced me to a new way of approaching and solving research problems.”
Teachers and scholars
Several private foundations provide recognition and stability for young faculty in the sciences. During the Campaign for a Better World, MIT faculty won 64 Sloan Research Fellowships, nine Packard Fellowships, four Cottrell Scholar Awards, and eight Camille Dreyfus Teacher-Scholar Awards.
“A big part of getting students excited is by showing them how excited you are,” says Tisdale, whose research focuses on advanced spectroscopy techniques and on next-generation semiconductor nanomaterials, including colloidal quantum dots and halide perovskites. His research could lead to major advances in fields as diverse as solar technology, medical imagery, and quantum computing. “I like thinking how these materials might benefit society. But I also love thinking about how things move around at the nanoscale.”
The teacher-scholar award, granted by the Camille & Henry Dreyfus Foundation, provided welcome wiggle room for his growing research group. “I used the Dreyfus funding to support exploration of new ideas, many of which became federally funded projects,” says Tisdale. “The flexibility of the Dreyfus funding was key for that.”
Underrepresented in science
As an experimental nuclear and particle physicist, Associate Professor Lindley Winslow enjoys the challenge of measuring things that are extremely hard to measure. “The motivation comes from trying to discover the smallest building blocks and how they affect the universe we live in,” she says.
Much of Winslow’s work focuses on neutrinos—subatomic particles that pass by the billions through ordinary matter. In 2016, she and colleagues earned the Breakthrough Prize in Fundamental Physics for work that detected neutrino oscillations for the first time. Today, she is continuing to try to answer some of the most tantalizing questions in contemporary physics: Why does the universe have more matter than antimatter? and What is dark matter made of?
Winslow credits good mentorship with helping her to advance her career, which is why in 2018 she established a physics research fellowship program for women with support from the Heising-Simons Foundation. The program includes a workshop on preparing research proposals. “Confidence in your ability to get grants is integral to wanting to stay in the field, and the numbers (of women physicists) are so low that we cannot afford to lose anyone,” she says.
Belinda Li thinks girls and underrepresented minority children need role models in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). “There are way too many stereotypes about computer science and technology,” says Li, a second-year graduate student at the Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab and a recipient of a Clare Boothe Luce Graduate Fellowship for Women. A program of the Henry Luce Foundation, the multiyear fellowship supports graduate women in STEM. “If they see someone who looks like them in those fields, they’re more likely to think they belong there.”
Li studies language models and natural language processing, an interest she developed after a year spent working in Facebook’s AI Integrity Team, which developed automated detectors for harmful content such as hate speech and misinformation. “I saw the extent to which we rely on language technologies to detect hate speech,” says Li, “and I don’t think current language models are always up to that task.”
Now, Li is going beyond hate speech detection to investigate whether machines actually understand the language they process. “The Clare Boothe Luce Fellowship allows me to pursue my research without having to worry about funding,” says Li. “It lends credibility to what I’m doing.”